Home » Musings » Real Greatness

Real Greatness

[3 April 2008 | 0 Comments | ]
Posted by Eric Santillan

MusingsWhen I was a child, I loved to play “hide-and-seek”. I loved hid­ing from my friends, and the thrill of being almost found, but not. I loved the thrill of wait­ing for them to find me in my secret hid­ing place. And then the sheer joy of out­wit­ting, out­run­ning or out­last­ing them. The best part is when they would start shout­ing for me to go out of my hid­ing place because they couldn’t find me at all and they’re just about ready to give up totally.

I real­ize that now, as an adult, I still love to play hide-and-seek; but it is a hide-and-seek of a dif­fer­ent kind. It is the hide-and-seek of val­ues and idealism.

It is fairly easy to lose what we value and what we believe in. You just hide it from peo­ple; then grad­u­ally you for­get about it because there are seem­ingly more impor­tant things to do, and the sys­tem or soci­ety itself does not encour­age the liv­ing out of what we believe in. After a while, you’re just about ready to give up totally, because then you real­ize that you have changed and you couldn’t go back to who you were.

I know of some­one for exam­ple, who really val­ued soli­tude and reflec­tion before, but has now lost it in the hus­tle and bus­tle of his job. When I asked him about it, he said that he started becom­ing so used to not hav­ing space for him­self in Law School because of the study sched­ules; and finally he no longer noticed that he had no more time for soli­tude and reflec­tion at all. He came to me one day, feel­ing dejected, con­fused, dis­cour­aged and wish­ing for the time when he had more time for him­self. It is a pity because I used to envy him secretly about his insis­tence on soli­tude and reflection.

When I was younger, I placed a lot of impor­tance on gen­eros­ity and giv­ing to those in need. I remem­ber that I would save part of my allowance to buy gifts for my kaba­bata, Cocoy. Cocoy lived in the squat­ters area near my home and I would always share what I have with him. When my dad bought me a brand new Nin­tendo Fam­ily Com­puter for exam­ple, Cocoy was one of the first ones to use it. Look­ing back, I real­ize it came from a very basic (even child­ish) real­iza­tion that I have been given more and this friend of mine had less. So I share. Because I want things to be equal between the two of us. It was eas­ier to share because I have been given more. Notice the word given. The things I shared to Cocoy weren’t mine per se. They were given to me. It was a gen­eros­ity that came from thanks­giv­ing. I was thank­ful, so I was able to share. Gen­eros­ity came from a grate­ful heart.

I have lost some of that gen­eros­ity now. It is no longer easy to give. I have become hardened.

This being hard­ened did not hap­pen overnight but was a grad­ual process. I now real­ize that it started with the grad­ual loss of this sense of thanks­giv­ing. I some­times for­get that things were given to me. I some­times think and act as if what I received, I received by right and per­sonal merit, as if I did not learn the things I learned from other peo­ple. As if I deserved it. I woke up one day, real­iz­ing I am no longer as gen­er­ous as when I was a child.

“The great man is one who does not lose his (orig­i­nally good) child’s heart.” [Book of Men­cius, 4B:12]

A par­al­lel pas­sage is found in the Chris­t­ian Gospels: “Unless you become like lit­tle chil­dren, you can not enter the King­dom of Heaven.”

So why this fuss about being like chil­dren and not los­ing the child’s heart?

We can say many things but I think it has to do with two basic things.

First, it is the child’s purity of heart. A child has a basic good­ness that comes out nat­u­rally with­out him/her really try­ing. A child acts with­out any guile—what you see is what you get. A child is not mean; he can be naughty, but even in his naugh­ti­ness, he’s not out to defraud, or be mean.

Great men are made of such as this. Mahatma Gandhi was a man with a basic goodness—nay, with a holi­ness that comes out with­out his really try­ing. It is said that Fr. Pedro Arrupe, for­mer Gen­eral Supe­rior of the Soci­ety of Jesus, was quite a naughty person—he would joke around, keep peo­ple on edge, make sweep­ing state­ments for shock value—but he was never mean. A Jesuit friend of mine used to say about him: “He was a happy holy man.”

Sec­ond, is the child’s abil­ity to dream. For a child, pos­si­bil­i­ties are end­less. For a child, every­thing is new and so every­thing is wait­ing to be known. A child is ide­al­is­tic. And his ide­al­ism is sim­ple: jus­tice ought to be upheld; you ought to give every man what is due him; you can find hope in seem­ingly hope­less sit­u­a­tions; love is the answer. We could say naivety because we know it is a lot more com­pli­cated and com­plex than that.

Read the rest of the arti­cle here…

Read more articles like this in: Musings
If you liked this article, share it:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Wists
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email
Powered by WordPress, a MacbookPro, coffee, and lots of love | Entries (RSS) | ©2006-2010. Ang Peregrino™ and Eric Dominic Santillan. Under Creative Commons License | Arthemia theme by Michael Jubel | This page made 54 queries and took 0.932 seconds to load.